– “Near-poor” Americans—people just above the federal poverty leve
l but still well below the average U.S. income—who rely on Medicare
for health insurance face high medical bills and may forgo essential health care, according to new research led by health policy scientists at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
. This is due to a coverage “cliff” in Medicaid
, which supplements Medicare for people with incomes below poverty but excludes individuals above the federal poverty threshold, including the near-poor.
In a report published today in the April issue of the journal Health Affairs
, the authors describe the effects of this cliff and propose solutions to fix it, with the aim of lessening barriers to care among near-poor people with Medicare.
“Medicaid provides vital assistance to low-income people with Medicare by covering Medicare’s high out-of-pocket costs and filling in gaps in Medicare coverage. However, Medicaid’s eligibility rules for low-income, older Americans have changed little in 30 years, exclude people barely above poverty, and make it difficult for those below poverty to enroll. As a result, many older Americans who live on modest incomes have difficulty affording care,” said lead author Eric T. Roberts, Ph.D., assistant professor in Pitt Public Health’s Department of Health Policy and Management
. “We’re overdue for modernization of the Medicaid program for older adults. The solutions we propose incorporate consumer responsibility while creating substantial improvements in health insurance coverage and access to care.”
They found that 73.3% of Medicare beneficiaries whose incomes were just below Medicaid’s eligibility threshold had supplemental health insurance coverage from Medicaid or another source, whereas only 47.5% of the near-poor had such supplemental coverage. The researchers define this 25.8 percentage point difference as “the coverage cliff.”
Near-poor beneficiaries affected by this coverage cliff incurred $2,288 in additional out-of-pocket health care spending over two years and were 33.1% more likely to spend more than one month’s income on health care costs than their counterparts below the poverty limit.
The team then looked at measures of health care utilization and found that the near-poor used 55% fewer outpatient and preventive health services and filled fewer prescriptions per year, including fewer chronic disease medications.
“These are the kinds of medications and doctor’s appointments that help people manage their health conditions and avoid costly hospital care,” Roberts said. “But, even more important, prior research has shown that these medications and doctor’s appointments can save lives.”
Roberts and his colleagues suggest several solutions to mitigate the Medicaid coverage cliff, namely:
- Expand Medicaid supplemental coverage to Medicare beneficiaries who make at least 150%, and preferably 200%, of the federal poverty limit.
- Offer this coverage on a sliding scale so recipients pay no more than a fixed proportion of their income on Medicare costs.
- Simplify Medicaid’s application process for seniors, which currently is far more complex than the application process for children and nonelderly adults.
- Expand opportunities for qualifying Medicare beneficiaries to enroll in the Medicare Part D “Low-Income Subsidy” to reduce prescription drug costs.
“As the U.S. population ages, analysts forecast a 40% growth in the Medicare population, and that over one-third of Medicare beneficiaries will have low to moderate incomes, making it ever more important to modernize Medicaid now,” Roberts said.
Additional authors on this research are Alexandra Glynn, Noelle Cornelio, Julie M. Donohue, Ph.D., Walid Gellad, M.D., M.P.H., and Lindsay M. Sabik, Ph.D., all of Pitt; and J. Michael McWilliams, M.D., Ph.D., of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital
CREDIT: University of Pittsburgh
CAPTION: Eric T. Roberts, Ph.D., assistant professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh.